Archive for "analysis"


Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?

  |  14 Comments
Categories: analysis, foreclosure advice, missing payments

In 1981, English punk rock band The Clash wrote “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” about the rocky personal relationships between members of the band when facing the dilemma of sticking together or breaking up. The lyrics could not be more appropriate for homeowners buried in a mountain of negative equity and wondering what to do. After all “if I go there will be trouble and if I stay it would be double.”

The first step in answering this question is to find out if you qualify for a modification or if you can refinance using the HARP program to take advantage of today’s low interest rates. The process of getting a modification can be very frustrating.  It’s “always tease, tease, tease, you’re happy when I am on my knees.” It not only takes a while to get approved, you must keep in mind that the lender does not have a legal obligation to offer or approve a loan modification. It is important to note that they may dual track your file, which means that while they are considering the modification they are moving forward with the foreclosure. Sometimes they “set you free” and foreclose in the middle of your modification application.

Let’s say you get a modification. I have a friend who was approved for what at first appeared to me to be an unbelievable loan modification. The modification did not lower the principle but did lower the interest rate to just 2 percent and locked that in for 30 years! This reduced their payment to the same amount that they would pay to rent a similar property. As such, it certainly seemed reasonable to stay – they get to keep their credit intact and remain owners, while paying no more than they would in rent anyway. Plus the payment remains fixed for 30 years, while rents would increase. But that analysis is incomplete. The question that remains is their status when they might want or need to sell, and when do they break even given the substantial negative equity that would remain?

Life events like divorce, death, job loss, job transfer, and others happen. Also sometimes folks just want to relocate. Based on our analysis, and assuming long-term home price appreciation rates, these folks would need to stay until 2026 to simply BREAK EVEN vs. paying rent. Worse, unless they use the rent savings to pay down principal, they’ll be stuck upside down in the property, and unable to sell without bank approval of a short sale until 2033. So whether or not it is a good deal for them depends a lot on how long they plan to stay.

For my friends, the best financial decision appears to be to try to short sell their current home, or if necessary let the bank foreclose. If they then rent for 3-5 years they should be able to qualify again to buy. Assuming interest rates don’t skyrocket, or some other major change doesn’t occur, this will save them over $100,000, and give them the flexibility to move if needed without being stuck in their current prison of debt until 2033.

Unfortunately, few homeowners facing this decision have the financial skills to really analyze the various scenarios, and few will consult a qualified accountant or other professional to do it for them.

This analysis is different for every homeowner facing this question. How far under water they are, and the terms of the loan modification are clearly important. It also requires some assumptions about price appreciation, rent inflation, and future interest rates. And importantly, it requires some serious thought as to how long they plan to stay, and perhaps some soul searching on the moral implications of walking away.

Bottom line, this question can be answered only by the homeowner based on their current situation and what is best for them. Would you stay or would you go now?

14 Comments

Looking Back: 2011 Analyzed, and My 2012 Real Estate Market Prediction

  |  10 Comments
Categories: analysis

Last year I attempted to make some predictions for the coming year. I thought it would be a worthwhile exercise to take a look back at 2011 and see how I did, and then share my thoughts on what should happen in the new year.

At this time last year, I predicted the following:

My prediction: The Fed appears committed to keep interest rates low.

What happened: Rates dropped in 2011. After a rise in the first quarter, the index rate dropped by 0.47 points by the end of the third quarter. Interest rates on a 30-year fixed mortgage dropped by almost one percent over the course of the year, from 4.79 in January to 3.96 in December.

My prediction: Lending standards will not loosen any time soon, and may tighten.

What happened: Fannie Mae tightened their guidelines earlier this year, no longer funding balloon mortgages and requiring borrowers to put down more money and have a higher credit score. There was lot’s of talk from Congress on further tightening as well.

My prediction: The FHA’s waiver of anti-flipping rules might expire, but shouldn’t.

What happened: On January 28th, the FHA extended the suspension of the anti-flipping rule. Sales to 3rd parties grow substantially in 2011. California saw an increase of 29.4 percent year-over-year, while Arizona and Nevada fared even better, with growth at 101.6 and 79.9 percent, respectively.

My prediction: There will be no new housing stimulus or tax credits in 2011, and the 2010 tax credits will steal demand from 2011.

What happened: Nothing. There were no new stimulus programs in 2011. Most markets experienced a decline in sales volume in 2011.

My prediction: Mortgage interest deductions will not go away in 2011, but are at risk longer term.

What happened: They remain intact.  The year ended with the NAR announcement that there will be no immediate proposals to limit the mortgage interest deduction in 2012. The National Association of Realtors appointed a super committee to vehemently defend the mortgage interest deduction. A historical year in review can be seen here.

My prediction: States face unprecedented shortfalls and begin to look to property taxes to make up the difference.

What happened: Property taxes saw varying increases around the country, California’s Prop 13 was increasingly called into question, and many saw services cut in light of declining property tax revenue. Still total tax revenues are higher than they were pre-bubble in most areas, and the reality is that rapid increases seen during the bubble were a windfall that should have been saved not squandered.

My prediction: The government will continue to roll out programs that do little to help distressed homeowners.

What happened: More of the same. This year saw some progress on loan modifications, short sales and refinance programs, but what homeowners really need is principal balance reduction and there has been little, if any, progress there.

My prediction: Confidence will remain low that the housing market has stabilized due to the government’s handling of the robo-signing controversy and intervention in the foreclosure process.

What happened: Consumer confidence remains low, and with the budget showdown, and drama in Europe, it became clear the lack of confidence extends well beyond housing.

My 2012 Real Estate Market Prediction

Pulse Loans should make a comeback – but won’t. Back when prices were so high it didn’t makes sense to make loans at all, anyone with a pulse could get one. Now that prices, at least in some areas, are so low that we should give loans to anyone with a pulse, loans are difficult to come by. I’d rather invest my money in a home loan for a family who has strategically defaulted, then give it to a bank to use for free. Yet lending regulations essentially prohibit me, and anyone else looking for reasonable returns in a zero interest rate environment, from making those loans.

In Washington DC, the politicians say that the government shouldn’t be in the business of making home loans. Yet at the same time they ratchet up lending regulations to such onerous levels that no one but the largest banks backed by government lenders or insurance would dare lend.

While I predict very little change in an election year, it is still my hope that leadership will emerge to build consensus around a clear path back to a functioning housing market. A market that provides American’s both access to the opportunity to buy a home, and to the opportunity to get decent returns by investing in home loans.

What is your 2012 Real Estate market prediction? Change or more of the same? We’d love to hear your thoughts.

10 Comments

The Foreclosure Report – September 2011

  |  2 Comments
Categories: analysis, foreclosure report, third party, Trustee Sale

After Big Jump in August, Foreclosure Starts Fall Again

After a significant jump in foreclosure starts in August, driven primarily by Bank of America, foreclosure starts returned to levels in line with prior months, far below the numbers reached at the peak.  California has seen a drop in activity of 56 percent since its peak, from 58,623 Notice of Default filings in March of 2009 to 25,778 today.  Arizona shows a similar swing in Notice of Trustee Sale filings, from 14,722 in March of 2009 to 5,982 filings last month – a decrease of 59.4 percent.  Washington shows the greatest decrease of all, with 71.5 percent less Notice of Trustee Sale filings today than at their peak in June of 2009.

Foreclosure sales were mixed this month, with declines in Arizona, California and Nevada, while Oregon and Washington both showed increases.  Despite the declines, the percentage purchased by third parties, typically investors, was at or near peak levels.  In California, third parties made up a record 27.4 percent of all sales last month. In Arizona, that number was even higher at 38.3 percent, also a record.  Nevada was just shy of their record, set in August at 29.1 percent.  Sales to third parties was up Washington was up 15.6 percent, a record for this year.  Oregon was the only state to to show a decrease, down from 15.5 percent in July to 6.0 percent today.

CLICK HERE for our complete September 2011 Foreclosure Report

2 Comments