<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Foreclosure crisis gets personal for Rep. Laura Richardson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:12:53 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2531</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2531</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I had heard that, but hadn&#039;t had a chance to confirm. Yes, I have had it happen a couple of times. Typically in these cases I ask the bank for proof of the error. If there was a legitimate error then there isn&#039;t a lot the buyer can do... though you can ask the bank to offset your expenses, lost interest on the money, etc. Afterall it was their fault (or the trustee they hired) and there is no reason you should be out of pocket as the buyer. But keep your request reasonable, and be thankful if it is approved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If they fail to provide any evidence of an error that would result in the sale being overturned eventually anyway, then I&#039;m less inclined to accept the news. Instead hire an attorney, put a lis pendens on the house and see everyone in court. Sometimes just letting the trustee know your considering that is enough that they either offer a better settlement, or they decide not to rescind. Be careful not to threaten - good trustees have seen everything and they&#039;re better at this then you are. But again, if your reasonable, and make a good argument you stand a good chance of avoiding court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Either way the bank or trustee potentially has liability so it is not my experience that they rescind these very lightly. Either the bank made a legitimate error on her sale, or they decided it was worth the risk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that Jose Canseco&#039;s foreclosure appears to have been rescinded repeatedly. Easier in that case as no one bid.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had heard that, but hadn&#8217;t had a chance to confirm. Yes, I have had it happen a couple of times. Typically in these cases I ask the bank for proof of the error. If there was a legitimate error then there isn&#8217;t a lot the buyer can do&#8230; though you can ask the bank to offset your expenses, lost interest on the money, etc. Afterall it was their fault (or the trustee they hired) and there is no reason you should be out of pocket as the buyer. But keep your request reasonable, and be thankful if it is approved.</p>
<p>If they fail to provide any evidence of an error that would result in the sale being overturned eventually anyway, then I&#8217;m less inclined to accept the news. Instead hire an attorney, put a lis pendens on the house and see everyone in court. Sometimes just letting the trustee know your considering that is enough that they either offer a better settlement, or they decide not to rescind. Be careful not to threaten &#8211; good trustees have seen everything and they&#8217;re better at this then you are. But again, if your reasonable, and make a good argument you stand a good chance of avoiding court.</p>
<p>Either way the bank or trustee potentially has liability so it is not my experience that they rescind these very lightly. Either the bank made a legitimate error on her sale, or they decided it was worth the risk.</p>
<p>Note that Jose Canseco&#8217;s foreclosure appears to have been rescinded repeatedly. Easier in that case as no one bid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebaglady</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2530</link>
		<dc:creator>thebaglady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2530</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey there, I like your blog a lot.  I&#039;m wondering what your thoughts are on the bank taking away the Sacramento property from the buyer?  Has this ever happened to you before?  Do you think the congresswoman used her political clout to make this happen?&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there, I like your blog a lot.  I&#8217;m wondering what your thoughts are on the bank taking away the Sacramento property from the buyer?  Has this ever happened to you before?  Do you think the congresswoman used her political clout to make this happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PDQ</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2529</link>
		<dc:creator>PDQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2529</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;She&#039;s an opportunistic deadbeat and a flake who can&#039;t manage her money.  Had her constituents known this about her they would have elected the better and more skilled candidate when Laura ran to replace Juanita Millender MacDonald.  As it was, it became a decision based solely on race which Laura played very well.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have no doubt her ex-husband and her primary congressional opponent are loving every minute of this scrutiny of her finances.  Her backers who insisted that the seat had to remain with a black candidate (even as the district trended Latin) are probably sneaking towards the exits with their Sunday church hats pulled down over their faces in shame - as they should.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s an opportunistic deadbeat and a flake who can&#8217;t manage her money.  Had her constituents known this about her they would have elected the better and more skilled candidate when Laura ran to replace Juanita Millender MacDonald.  As it was, it became a decision based solely on race which Laura played very well.  </p>
</p>
<p>I have no doubt her ex-husband and her primary congressional opponent are loving every minute of this scrutiny of her finances.  Her backers who insisted that the seat had to remain with a black candidate (even as the district trended Latin) are probably sneaking towards the exits with their Sunday church hats pulled down over their faces in shame &#8211; as they should.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2528</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 01:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2528</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Right ECG, but no 2nd on this one.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right ECG, but no 2nd on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ECG</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2527</link>
		<dc:creator>ECG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2527</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But the second (if she had one) could still go after her for deficiency judgment as long it wasn&#039;t purchase money...&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the second (if she had one) could still go after her for deficiency judgment as long it wasn&#8217;t purchase money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2526</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 00:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2526</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Mi Micheal,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That can be true in some states, but not in California. She is actually cleared twice. First the loan on the Sacremento house that she allegedly walked away from was actually a purchase money loan, not a refinance. Deficiency judgements may not be sought for purchase money loans in California. Second the lender used the non-judicial foreclosure process, as is almost always done in California. This expedites the foreclosure for the lender, but precludes them for coming after her for a deficiency judgement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None of the above would preclude them for going after her for fraud, however. There is already some speculation on &lt;a class=&quot;content&quot; href=&quot;http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/05/congressional-speculator.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;another blog&lt;/a&gt;  that perhaps she did not have sufficient income to qualify for that loan given her other obligations without comitting fraud on the loan application.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mi Micheal,</p>
<p>That can be true in some states, but not in California. She is actually cleared twice. First the loan on the Sacremento house that she allegedly walked away from was actually a purchase money loan, not a refinance. Deficiency judgements may not be sought for purchase money loans in California. Second the lender used the non-judicial foreclosure process, as is almost always done in California. This expedites the foreclosure for the lender, but precludes them for coming after her for a deficiency judgement.</p>
<p>None of the above would preclude them for going after her for fraud, however. There is already some speculation on <a class="content" href="http://calculatedrisk.blogspot.com/2008/05/congressional-speculator.html" target="_blank">another blog</a>  that perhaps she did not have sufficient income to qualify for that loan given her other obligations without comitting fraud on the loan application.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelY</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2525</link>
		<dc:creator>MichaelY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2525</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;She is gonna be in for a nasty surprise . . .&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can&#039;t just walk away from a refi like you can from a First Mortgage.  Thats secured debt, and if follows you after you leave, unless you declare bankruptcy.  At least thats the way I understand it.  Any experts?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She is gonna be in for a nasty surprise . . .</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t just walk away from a refi like you can from a First Mortgage.  Thats secured debt, and if follows you after you leave, unless you declare bankruptcy.  At least thats the way I understand it.  Any experts?</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2524</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2524</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;UPDATE - Despite being the first to spot that her Long Beach home was also recently in foreclosure, it never occured to us to look for more. The &lt;a class=&quot;content&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_9366061&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Daily Breeze&lt;/a&gt; now reports she has a third property in San Pedro, CA which we have in our system as scheduled for foreclosure auction 7/14/2008. It was originally scheduled for auction 5/14/2008 - but was postponed due to Mutual Agreement - which indicates she and her lender mutually agreed to postpone the sale. At least this home, which she has owned since 1994, has a 30yr fixed mortgage though it was only taken out May 2, 2005. Both the Long Beach and Sacrmento properties had 2/28 ARMs which given the terms appear to be subprime.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE &#8211; Despite being the first to spot that her Long Beach home was also recently in foreclosure, it never occured to us to look for more. The <a class="content" href="http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_9366061" target="_blank">Daily Breeze</a> now reports she has a third property in San Pedro, CA which we have in our system as scheduled for foreclosure auction 7/14/2008. It was originally scheduled for auction 5/14/2008 &#8211; but was postponed due to Mutual Agreement &#8211; which indicates she and her lender mutually agreed to postpone the sale. At least this home, which she has owned since 1994, has a 30yr fixed mortgage though it was only taken out May 2, 2005. Both the Long Beach and Sacrmento properties had 2/28 ARMs which given the terms appear to be subprime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2523</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 08:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2523</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;There are lots of blogs and forums for politics - would appreciate sticking to foreclosures here. Thanks. &lt;img title=&quot;Smile&quot; src=&quot;/modules/tinymce/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-smile.gif&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;Smile&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are lots of blogs and forums for politics &#8211; would appreciate sticking to foreclosures here. Thanks. <img title="Smile" src="/modules/tinymce/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-smile.gif" border="0" alt="Smile" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.foreclosuretruth.com/blog/sean/foreclosure-crisis-gets-personal-for-rep-laura-richardson/#comment-2522</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 03:29:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.www.foreclosuretruth.com/?p=171#comment-2522</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Clinton?  Bush?  Obama?  McCain?  Who gives a crap who she supports.  All I know is this country is an economic mess and we continue to shell out $22 billion a month on this &quot;skirmish&quot; in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll vote for Pee Wee Herman before I&#039;ll vote for another lying Republican....&lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clinton?  Bush?  Obama?  McCain?  Who gives a crap who she supports.  All I know is this country is an economic mess and we continue to shell out $22 billion a month on this &#8220;skirmish&#8221; in Iraq.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll vote for Pee Wee Herman before I&#8217;ll vote for another lying Republican&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
