Author Archive


Should I Stay or Should I Go Now?

  |  14 Comments
Categories: analysis, foreclosure advice, missing payments

In 1981, English punk rock band The Clash wrote “Should I Stay or Should I Go?” about the rocky personal relationships between members of the band when facing the dilemma of sticking together or breaking up. The lyrics could not be more appropriate for homeowners buried in a mountain of negative equity and wondering what to do. After all “if I go there will be trouble and if I stay it would be double.”

The first step in answering this question is to find out if you qualify for a modification or if you can refinance using the HARP program to take advantage of today’s low interest rates. The process of getting a modification can be very frustrating.  It’s “always tease, tease, tease, you’re happy when I am on my knees.” It not only takes a while to get approved, you must keep in mind that the lender does not have a legal obligation to offer or approve a loan modification. It is important to note that they may dual track your file, which means that while they are considering the modification they are moving forward with the foreclosure. Sometimes they “set you free” and foreclose in the middle of your modification application.

Let’s say you get a modification. I have a friend who was approved for what at first appeared to me to be an unbelievable loan modification. The modification did not lower the principle but did lower the interest rate to just 2 percent and locked that in for 30 years! This reduced their payment to the same amount that they would pay to rent a similar property. As such, it certainly seemed reasonable to stay – they get to keep their credit intact and remain owners, while paying no more than they would in rent anyway. Plus the payment remains fixed for 30 years, while rents would increase. But that analysis is incomplete. The question that remains is their status when they might want or need to sell, and when do they break even given the substantial negative equity that would remain?

Life events like divorce, death, job loss, job transfer, and others happen. Also sometimes folks just want to relocate. Based on our analysis, and assuming long-term home price appreciation rates, these folks would need to stay until 2026 to simply BREAK EVEN vs. paying rent. Worse, unless they use the rent savings to pay down principal, they’ll be stuck upside down in the property, and unable to sell without bank approval of a short sale until 2033. So whether or not it is a good deal for them depends a lot on how long they plan to stay.

For my friends, the best financial decision appears to be to try to short sell their current home, or if necessary let the bank foreclose. If they then rent for 3-5 years they should be able to qualify again to buy. Assuming interest rates don’t skyrocket, or some other major change doesn’t occur, this will save them over $100,000, and give them the flexibility to move if needed without being stuck in their current prison of debt until 2033.

Unfortunately, few homeowners facing this decision have the financial skills to really analyze the various scenarios, and few will consult a qualified accountant or other professional to do it for them.

This analysis is different for every homeowner facing this question. How far under water they are, and the terms of the loan modification are clearly important. It also requires some assumptions about price appreciation, rent inflation, and future interest rates. And importantly, it requires some serious thought as to how long they plan to stay, and perhaps some soul searching on the moral implications of walking away.

Bottom line, this question can be answered only by the homeowner based on their current situation and what is best for them. Would you stay or would you go now?

14 Comments

Vultures – An Essential Part of the Real Estate Ecosystem

  |  3 Comments
Categories: advice, Foreclosure & Housing Markets
Tags: , , , ,     

In the animal kingdom it’s ironic that we glorify predators, like the lion, while we vilify scavengers, like the vulture, that clean up the mess left behind. Even the great Benjamin Franklin was unable to fight this prejudice in his preference of the turkey over the eagle (a predator) as a national symbol. If you encounter a lion on the savannah, it will kill you. If you run across a vulture in the process of cleaning up the carnage caused by the lion, you will be perfectly safe.

Unlike lions and other large predators, vultures don’t need to kill to survive. They serve a useful purpose by disposing of dead and decaying animal remains, cleaning up in areas with poor or non-existent sanitation. This, however, does not make them popular and it is doubtful that any major league sports teams would ever choose a vulture as a mascot.

Let’s bring this scenario home to the concrete jungle.

In almost every housing market that is plagued by negative equity and foreclosures you will find the decaying remains of houses, and sometimes entire neighborhoods. Despite the big lie to the contrary, Wall Street predators caused this crisis. Communities struggle to keep up with the mess they left behind. Now even those protesting Wall Street are adding to the carnage by breaking into properties, squatting in them, and even setting fire to them.

And who comes along to reverse the decay and clean up the carnage created by the predator? Real estate investors, often referred to as the vultures of the real estate industry, and like the vulture, unappreciated for the service they perform and the value they bring to these devastated communities. These investors are not only infusing the local economy with jobs but they are also working to create new homeownership opportunities, by bringing these properties back to marketable condition – a function that is a critical element in our housing recovery.

The average investor typically spends $10,000 to $15,000 rehabbing a property, which directly results in local jobs for contractors and other vendors. Plus most “vultures” will resell the property, resulting in real estate commissions, lending fees, title fees, inspections, appraisals, advertising and more… ALL of which creates jobs and supports the local economy. Finally, the sale and clean up of the property also means that past due property taxes will be paid, which is revenue our local counties and schools desperately need.

Real estate investors are not predators. They do not cause foreclosures. To the contrary, they are an integral part of helping to clean up this housing disaster. Call them investors, speculators, opportunists or even vultures but make sure that you realize the important role they play in the real estate ecosystem.

3 Comments